|
|
|
November 5th, 2008
08:27 am - Two words: whoo hoo Obama in the White House! Dems control Senate (56-40!) Dems control House (251-173) Dems take control of both the Senate and Assembly in Wisconsin for the first time since I was 6.
Change is coming! Current Mood: hopeful
|
September 19th, 2008
01:40 pm - Blocking Care for Women http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/19/opinion/19clinton.html?_r=1&scp=1&sq=cecile%20richards&st=cse&oref=slogin
Blocking Care for Women By Hillary Rodham Clinton, Democratic senator from New York, and Cecile Richards, president of Planned Parenthood Federation of America Published: September 18, 2008
LAST month, the Bush administration launched the latest salvo in its eight-year campaign to undermine women's rights and women's health by placing ideology ahead of science: a proposed rule from the Department of Health and Human Services that would govern family planning. It would require that any health care entity that receives federal financing — whether it's a physician in private practice, a hospital or a state government — certify in writing that none of its employees are required to assist in any way with medical services they find objectionable.
Laws that have been on the books for some 30 years already allow doctors to refuse to perform abortions. The new rule would go further, ensuring that all employees and volunteers for health care entities can refuse to aid in providing any treatment they object to, which could include not only abortion and sterilization but also contraception.
Health and Human Services estimates that the rule, which would affect nearly 600,000 hospitals, clinics and other health care providers, would cost $44.5 million a year to administer. Astonishingly, the department does not even address the real cost to patients who might be refused access to these critical services. Women patients, who look to their health care providers as an unbiased source of medical information, might not even know they were being deprived of advice about their options or denied access to care.
The definition of abortion in the proposed rule is left open to interpretation. An earlier draft included a medically inaccurate definition that included commonly prescribed forms of contraception like birth control pills, IUD's and emergency contraception. That language has been removed, but because the current version includes no definition at all, individual health care providers could decide on their own that birth control is the same as abortion.
The rule would also allow providers to refuse to participate in unspecified "other medical procedures" that contradict their religious beliefs or moral convictions. This, too, could be interpreted as a free pass to deny access to contraception.
Many circumstances unrelated to reproductive health could also fall under the umbrella of "other medical procedures." Could physicians object to helping patients whose sexual orientation they find objectionable? Could a receptionist refuse to book an appointment for an H.I.V. test? What about an emergency room doctor who wishes to deny emergency contraception to a rape victim? Or a pharmacist who prefers not to refill a birth control prescription?
The Bush administration argues that the rule is designed to protect a provider's conscience. But where are the protections for patients?
The 30-day comment period on the proposed rule runs until Sept. 25. Everyone who believes that women should have full access to medical care should make their voices heard. Basic, quality care for millions of women is at stake. Current Mood: depressed
|
September 11th, 2008
02:57 pm - She's the wrong woman for me, too, Gloria!
http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/opinion/la-oe-steinem4-2008sep04,0,1290251.story
Palin: wrong woman, wrong message Sarah Palin shares nothing but a chromosome with Hillary Clinton. She is Phyllis Schlafly, only younger. By Gloria Steinem September 4, 2008 Here's the good news: Women have become so politically powerful that even the anti-feminist right wing -- the folks with a headlock on the Republican Party -- are trying to appease the gender gap with a first-ever female vice president. We owe this to women -- and to many men too -- who have picketed, gone on hunger strikes or confronted violence at the polls so women can vote. We owe it to Shirley Chisholm, who first took the "white-male-only" sign off the White House, and to Hillary Rodham Clinton, who hung in there through ridicule and misogyny to win 18 million votes. But here is even better news: It won't work. This isn't the first time a boss has picked an unqualified woman just because she agrees with him and opposes everything most other women want and need. Feminism has never been about getting a job for one woman. It's about making life more fair for women everywhere. It's not about a piece of the existing pie; there are too many of us for that. It's about baking a new pie. ( Read more... ) </div> I love this quote: I defend her right to be wrong, even on issues that matter most to me. Kind of like my fav Voltaire quote: “I do not agree with a word that you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it” I am a member of a weekly haiku writing group. This was my Haiky last week:
2 X chromosomes does not equal women's rights Hockey mom scares me Current Mood: my brain is full
|
September 4th, 2008
01:58 pm - An Open Letter to Gov. Sarah Palin on Women's Rights
An Open Letter to Gov. Sarah Palin on Women's Rights By Lynn Paltrow, National Advocates for Pregnant Women Posted on September 4, 2008, Printed on September 4, 2008 http://www.alternet.org/story/97457/
( Read more... ) Current Mood: exhausted
|
11:15 am - GOP convention = angry, immature attacks Which, by a check of the facts seem to make claims that are not even close to the truth...why am I not surprised?
Attacks, praise stretch truth at GOP convention
After hearing the dems praise McCain for his character and service, while respectfully stating that they disagreed with his politics and plans for our country, I couldn't help but laugh at how pathetic the GOP looked when they spent their soap box time, making fun of Obama for his work as a community organizer and his message of hope and Biden for being an underdog in the primary.
I would also like to take a moment and reflect on a gazellesoncrack post from yesterday re: abortion rights.
I also don't understand why the Christian right is characterizing Sarah Palin as pro-life because she had a baby she knew was going to be disabled. Deciding to keep a baby, whether a baby with Downs Syndrome or an unplanned pregnancy at age 17, makes one pro-life? I am decidedly pro-choice, but I don't think I would make the choice to have an abortion in either of those circumstances, although, I can't say for sure because I haven't been there. I think the main issue is that many anti-choice folks consider pro-choice folks to be pro-abortion, when NO ONE is pro-abortion. I, for one, support access to health care, birth control and COMPREHENSIVE sex education, because I would like to see a reduction in the number of women who face unplanned pregnancies (about 60% of pregnancies to women in their 20s are unplanned) and are consequently faced with the difficult decision about what to do. I am ALL about reducing the number of abortions in this country. But you don't do that with hate rhetoric, shame tactics, abstinence only education and reduced access to birth control!
Off of my soap box... Current Mood: anxious
|
August 29th, 2008
10:35 am - McCain places last nail in coffin with VP choice I think that McCain made the best possible choice for his running mate, for the Obama campaign, that is. If he was hoping to get the woman vote, his judgement was off. Plus, choosing a relatively unknown candidate from a non-battle ground state seems non-strategic. It seems like he was going for the novelty factor.
On a personal note: Feminists for Life is an oxymoron.
Governor Sarah Palin (R-AK) Sarah Palin, a Republican and the first female Governor of Alaska, is strongly pro-life as well as pro-contraception and belongs to Feminists for Life. In 2002, when she was running for Lieutenant Governor, Palin sent an e-mail to the Alaska Right to Life Board saying she was as "pro-life as any candidate can be" and has "adamantly supported our cause since I first understood, as a child, the atrocity of abortion." Palin said in July 2006 that no woman should have to choose between her career, education and her child. "I believe in the strength and the power of women, and the potential of every human life," en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feminists_for_Life
Current Mood: busy
|
November 14th, 2006
09:53 am - Ooh this is good! A Liberal's Pledge to Disheartened Conservatives ( Read more... )
I signed it. Will you???? Current Location: ppwi Current Mood: annoyed
|
November 13th, 2006
November 8th, 2006
June 28th, 2006
03:49 pm - Keep your Jesus off my penis Rarely do I see media that encapsulates my views quite as perfectly as this video:
http://www.atomfilms.com/af/content/jesus_off Current Location: ppwi Current Mood: busy
|
|
|